According to the New York Times, Apple’s use of Apple Maps, a decision substituting its own mapping software for rival Google’s in the iPhone 5 and the new iOS 6 operating system, appears to be a textbook case of what’s known as a tying arrangement, sometimes referred to as “bundling.” In bundling, the purchase of one good or service (the iPhone) is conditioned on the purchase or use of a second (Apple maps). Such arrangements extend the control of a dominant producer, thus violating antitrust laws. The best example of which is Microsoft’s attempt to bundle its Internet Explorer browser on Windows software, to the disadvantage of Netscape.
Featured News
Florida Attorney General Launches Investigation Into OpenAI and ChatGPT
Apr 9, 2026 by
CPI
Chainalysis Sees Stablecoins Becoming Core Global Payment Infrastructure
Apr 9, 2026 by
CPI
Meta Ramps Up AI Spending with New $21 Billion Cloud Agreement
Apr 9, 2026 by
CPI
StubHub to Pay $10 Million to Settle FTC Ticket Pricing Case
Apr 9, 2026 by
CPI
Apple Seeks International Help to Obtain Samsung Evidence in DOJ Antitrust Case
Apr 9, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Competitor Collaborations
Mar 26, 2026 by
CPI
Between Scylla and Charybdis – Navigating Transatlantic Antitrust Currents
Mar 26, 2026 by
Tilman Kuhn & Niklas Brüggemann
Cartel Enforcement Moves Into the Labor Market: Trends and Implications
Mar 26, 2026 by
Andreas Kafetzopoulos & Caroline Janssens
Rethinking Buy-Side Antitrust “Group Boycotts”
Mar 26, 2026 by
Craig Falls & Brendan McGuire
Positive Collaborations: The Tools Available to Competition Authorities to Encourage Beneficial Interactions Between Competitors
Mar 26, 2026 by
Rona Bar-Isaac & Thomas Withers