U.S.: Medical supply distributor accuses cos of predatory pricing, wants $200M
Two medical supply companies, Cardinal Health Inc. and Owens & Minor Inc., were served a lawsuit seeking $200 million from the companies for alleged anticompetitive behavior. Suture Express Inc., a distributor of specialty medical supplies, is claiming that the two companies abused their dominant positions in the market to punish healthcare providers who bought their supplies from Suture Express. Specifically, the lawsuit says that Cardinal Health and Owens & Minor threatened their customers with a “predatory pricing” surcharge of up to 5 percent on additional products if those customers did not also buy their suture and endomechanical supplies from them; the supplies are used in the process of stitching and minimally-invasive medical procedures.
Featured News
Apple Opens Early Settlement Discussions With DOJ
Jul 17, 2026 by
CPI
South Korean Steelmaker POSCO Expands Supplier Support Pact With Antitrust Regulator
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
FCC’s Carr Criticizes California-Led Bid to Block Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Deal
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
EU Top Court Upholds Antitrust Powers to Seize Corporate Emails
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
Uber Launches $14.8 Billion Bid for Delivery Hero in Landmark Food Delivery Deal
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Agentic AI & Antitrust
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
AI Agents and Collusion: The Two Faces of Agentic AI
Jul 16, 2026 by
Giovanna Massarotto
Agentic AI’s Regulatory Conundrum
Jul 16, 2026 by
Anant Raut
Inter-AI-Agent Competition
Jul 16, 2026 by
Stefan Thomas
Navigating the Increasing Regulatory Scrutiny of AI-Pricing Tools: Competition and Other Emerging Risks
Jul 16, 2026 by
Mark Krotoski & Vinny Sidhu