U.S.: Medical supply distributor accuses cos of predatory pricing, wants $200M
Two medical supply companies, Cardinal Health Inc. and Owens & Minor Inc., were served a lawsuit seeking $200 million from the companies for alleged anticompetitive behavior. Suture Express Inc., a distributor of specialty medical supplies, is claiming that the two companies abused their dominant positions in the market to punish healthcare providers who bought their supplies from Suture Express. Specifically, the lawsuit says that Cardinal Health and Owens & Minor threatened their customers with a “predatory pricing” surcharge of up to 5 percent on additional products if those customers did not also buy their suture and endomechanical supplies from them; the supplies are used in the process of stitching and minimally-invasive medical procedures.
Featured News
Air Canada Disputes Competition Bureau’s Report on Airline Market
Jun 22, 2025 by
CPI
CMA Initiates Market Study on UK Road and Railway Infrastructure Delivery
Jun 22, 2025 by
CPI
Turkey Opens Antitrust Investigation into Google Over Digital Advertising Practices
Jun 22, 2025 by
CPI
Florida Legislature Pushes for Tougher Noncompete Restrictions
Jun 22, 2025 by
CPI
Apple Explores Potential Acquisition of AI Startup Perplexity AI
Jun 22, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Theories of Harm
Jun 17, 2025 by
CPI
What Do We Mean by Harm to the Competitive Process?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Sean Sullivan
Is There a Better Approach to Vertical Merger Analysis?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Bob Majure & Andrew Sfekas
California’s Ill-Advised Turn Toward Europeanized Theories of Harm For Single-Firm Conduct
Jun 17, 2025 by
Geoffrey Manne, Dirk Auer & Brian Albrecht
EU Competition Policy in Support of Democracy and Sustainability: What Theories of Harm When Moving Away From the Predominance of the Consumer Welfare Paradigm?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Marios C. Iacovides