A PYMNTS Company

Uber & Chamber Of Commerce Dismiss Seattle’s Drivers Union Law

By  |  April 14, 2020

The US Chamber of Commerce, an Uber subsidiary and the city of Seattle have agreed to lay down their swords in a lawsuit challenging the city’s ordinance that lets ride-hailing, app-based drivers unionize, resolving a three-year court battle that saw two appeals to the Ninth Circuit, reported Law 360. 

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    In a stipulation for dismissal reached on Thursday and signed by US District Judge Robert S. Lasnik on Friday, the Chamber, Uber Technologies Inc. subsidiary Rasier and Seattle agreed to dismiss the remaining claims that the city’s 2015 law giving for-hire drivers for apps like Uber and Lyft, who are typically independent contractors,  the right to collectively bargain runs afoul of the federal Sherman Antitrust Act.

    The stipulation did not provide details behind the decision to drop the suit, but did specify that the claims would be dismissed without prejudice and without an award of fees or costs to any party.

    The Chamber and Rasier argued that Seattle’s ordinance improperly authorizes and facilitates “horizontal group boycotts” by clearing the way for groups of unionized independent drivers to muscle out rival drivers by preventing them from contracting with ride-hailing companies outside the terms of a collective bargaining agreement.

    But Seattle countered that it tweaked the law to remove potentially problematic provisions authorizing horizontal price-fixing.

    In a statement on Friday, the city said it was pleased the parties agreed to drop the lawsuit and that it would turn its focus to working with Uber, Lyft and other transportation network companies on the “Fare Share Plan” that creates fair compensation standards and worker protections for drivers, while also investing in affordable housing and transit.

    The plan requires that drivers be paid at least the equivalent of Seattle’s large employer minimum wage, plus benefits and expenses, according to the statement, among other benefits for the drivers.

    Full Content: Law 360

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.