
Pharmaceutical companies Pfizer and Flynn have been accused by the UK’s competition watchdog of illegally overcharging the National Health Service (NHS) for vital anti-epilepsy drugs by abusing their dominance in the market to raise prices overnight.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has confirmed its 2016 finding that the pair exploited a loophole to charge unfairly high prices for phenytoin sodium capsules by debranding the drug, known as Epanutin, in 2012 so it would not face price regulation.
The watchdog began reassessing the case after the drugs maker Pfizer appealed against the CMA’s 2016 fine of £84.2 million (US$117.2 million) – a record at the time – for raising the cost of the anti-epilepsy drug by up to 2,600%. Flynn Pharma, a drugs distributor, faced a fine of £5.2 million (US$7.2 million) for charging excessive and unfair prices for phenytoin sodium capsules.
Although the Competition Appeal Tribunal upheld parts of the watchdog’s findings, it referred the matter of whether Pfizer and Flynn abused their market position back to the CMA for further consideration.
The CMA stated after carefully assessing further evidence it believes that the pair were able to abuse their dominant position to overcharge the NHS, by debranding the capsules which are used by an estimated 48,000 epilepsy patients in the UK to prevent and control seizures.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
FTC v. Meta Trial Turns to Market Definition
Apr 28, 2025 by
CPI
Marriott to Acquire CitizenM for $355 Million, Expanding Urban Lifestyle Offerings
Apr 28, 2025 by
CPI
Thomson Reuters Urges Third Circuit to Block Ross Intelligence’s Copyright Appeal
Apr 28, 2025 by
CPI
Merck KGaA to Acquire SpringWorks for $3.9 Billion
Apr 28, 2025 by
CPI
Federal Judge Dismisses Mario Chalmers’ Antitrust Lawsuit Against NCAA Over NIL Rights
Apr 28, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece