On Monday the High Court rejected the claims brought by Gallaher and Somerfield, who argued that they had been treated unfairly in agreements reached with the Office of Fair Trading after an investigation into anti-competitive practices relating to the sale of tobacco.
The OFT’s investigation into the retail pricing of tobacco products began in March 2003 and reached a decision imposing total fines of 300 million on a number of retailers for pricing arrangements which the OFT found had infringed Chapter I of the Competition Act.
In the present proceedings Gallaher and Somerfield argued that they had been treated unfairly by comparison with another company that had entered into an early resolution agreement and should have their penalties repaid.
The High Court has rejected the claims which reaffirms the use of early resolution agreements in antitrust cases in the UK.
Full Content: Gov.uk
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Turkey Hits Meta with $37.20 Million Fine Over Data-Sharing Practices
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Google Seeks Dismissal of UK Suit Over Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI