The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills has reportedly amended its rules that will now make it more likely that consumers harmed by companies’ competition abuses will be financially repaid. Companies found guilty of price-fixing will now be forced to offer redress (also known as class-action) on behalf of the consumers affected, and those consumers will have to opt-out of collective redress, whereas previously, consumers had to opt-in. Small businesses will also benefit from the change, which includes a “fast track regime” and declares the Competition Appeal Tribunal as the main court for competition actions in the UK. Also included in the alterations is an Alternative Dispute Resolution, which makes it easier for consumers or small businesses to settle disputes over allegations of larger corporations’ price-fixing outside of court.
Full Content: Fresh Business Thinking
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
US Consumer Watchdog Eyes Expansion of ‘Junk Fee’ Crackdown Ahead of 2024 Election
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil Proposes Reform to Competition Law Targeting Big Tech
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Enhances User Data Control, Resolving German Antitrust Dispute
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
X May Be Excluded from EU’s Strict Tech Rules, Sources Suggest
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
G7 Targets Competitive Imbalances in Semiconductor Industry
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh