The Department for Business, Innovation & Skills has reportedly amended its rules that will now make it more likely that consumers harmed by companies’ competition abuses will be financially repaid. Companies found guilty of price-fixing will now be forced to offer redress (also known as class-action) on behalf of the consumers affected, and those consumers will have to opt-out of collective redress, whereas previously, consumers had to opt-in. Small businesses will also benefit from the change, which includes a “fast track regime” and declares the Competition Appeal Tribunal as the main court for competition actions in the UK. Also included in the alterations is an Alternative Dispute Resolution, which makes it easier for consumers or small businesses to settle disputes over allegations of larger corporations’ price-fixing outside of court.
Featured News
Google Submits Revised Search Plan to Avoid EU Antitrust Penalty
Jun 22, 2025 by
CPI
Vet School Sues Over ‘Gatekeeping’ Standards, Citing Antitrust Concerns
Jun 22, 2025 by
CPI
As Congress Considers a Ban On State AI Regs, California and NY Forge Ahead
Jun 19, 2025 by
CPI
Canada Watchdog Calls for Easing Foreign Investment Rules in Airline Sector
Jun 19, 2025 by
CPI
Litigation Finance Battle Heats Up in Tyson Foods Price-Fixing Case
Jun 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Theories of Harm
Jun 17, 2025 by
CPI
What Do We Mean by Harm to the Competitive Process?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Sean Sullivan
Is There a Better Approach to Vertical Merger Analysis?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Bob Majure & Andrew Sfekas
California’s Ill-Advised Turn Toward Europeanized Theories of Harm For Single-Firm Conduct
Jun 17, 2025 by
Geoffrey Manne, Dirk Auer & Brian Albrecht
EU Competition Policy in Support of Democracy and Sustainability: What Theories of Harm When Moving Away From the Predominance of the Consumer Welfare Paradigm?
Jun 17, 2025 by
Marios C. Iacovides