A PYMNTS Company

UK’s CMA Increasingly Hostile to Business, Says INEOS Chair

By  |  July 4, 2023

Sir Jim Ratcliffe, the chair of INEOS, the private chemicals giant, has accused Britain’s competition watchdog of being ‘increasingly hostile to business’, following its rejection of the firm’s $1bn acquisition of Sika AG, a concrete additives business.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Ratcliffe claims the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) prevented the takeover without having any competing businesses and refused to meet face-to-face in the process. The rejection has seen Sika AG, which employed 1,600 people across the world producing concrete admixtures needed for the construction industry, purchased by a US firm instead.

    Speaking out about the decision, Ratcliffe stated, “The latest snub led to Sir Jim Ratcliffe accusing the CMA of ‘building a reputation as an overly aggressive regulator with little regard for the impact of its decisions on UK business.’” He added, “He claimed ‘the CMA and UK government are becoming increasingly hostile to business.’”

    Read more: UK CMA Accepts CVS’s Offer To Sell The Vet, Ending Probe

    Responding to Ratcliffe’s remarks, a CMA spokesperson offered an explanation for the rejection: “Effective merger control is pro-business and pro-growth… When we conclude a deal can go ahead subject to part of a merged business being sold, we assess, among other criteria, whether potential buyers could lead to further competition problems. It is critical when approving a potential buyer that we don’t allow new competition problems to develop.”

    The CMA also pointed to estimates which suggest that during the past 3 years, the CMA merger regime has saved consumers more than £2 billion.

    It appears, then, that while Ratcliffe is criticizing the CMA’s decisions, they are only attempting to safeguard both businesses and consumers from the impact of larger mergers that may prevent competition.