A federal court order blocking Pacific Seafood Group from purchasing Ocean Gold Seafoods will remain until a trial into whether the sale would create a monopoly.
Commercial fishermen won a preliminary injunction against the sale last year in U.S. District Court in Medford. A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the district court’s order Tuesday.
The fishermen allege that Pacific Seafood’s acquisition of Ocean Gold, a large fish processor in Westport, Washington, would establish a monopoly in the groundfish, whiting and coldwater shrimp markets.
Pacific Seafood, a Clackamas-based company that is a dominant player in fish processing and distribution, announced after a legal setback last year that the deal for Ocean Gold was canceled.
But the company, led by Frank Dulcich, wanted the court to compel arbitration as part of a previous antitrust suit by fishermen that was settled. The district court declined, a decision also upheld by the appeals court.
Judge A. Wallace Tashima found that the fishermen — including Dennis Rankin of Astoria — showed a sufficient likelihood of success in their legal challenge and demonstrated the potential for irreparable harm from the sale.
The Oregon Attorney General’s Office has called the potential merger of Pacific Seafood and Ocean Gold “presumptively unlawful given the degree of market concentration.”
“The decision this week was about where the dispute would be heard,” said Daniel Occhipinti, Pacific Seafood’s general counsel and director of government affairs. “We’re disappointed with the ruling but we continue to maintain that the plaintiffs’ claims are meritless, and we will prove that in whatever forum we have to.”
Full Content: The Daily Astorian
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Orders Apple to Address Fortnite App Block or Face Court Hearing
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
EU Civil Society Groups and Labor Unions Raise Alarm Over Proposed Changes to GDPR
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Regulators Push Back Deadline on UniCredit’s Takeover Bid for Banco BPM
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
Intel Challenges €376 Million EU Fine in Ongoing Antitrust Dispute
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
Red Bull Challenges EU Commission Over Lengthy Antitrust Inspection
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Healthcare Antitrust
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare & Antitrust: What to Expect in the New Trump Administration
May 14, 2025 by
Nana Wilberforce, John W O'Toole & Sarah Pugh
Patent Gaming and Disparagement: Commission Fines Teva For Improperly Protecting Its Blockbuster Medicine
May 14, 2025 by
Blaž Višnar, Boris Andrejaš, Apostolos Baltzopoulos, Rieke Kaup, Laura Nistor & Gianluca Vassallo
Strategic Alliances in the Pharma Sector: An EU Competition Law Perspective
May 14, 2025 by
Christian Ritz & Benedikt Weiss
Monopsony Power in the Hospital Labor Market
May 14, 2025 by
Kevin E. Pflum & Christian Salas