A federal judge found Apple, Inc. guilty of conspiring to fix prices of ebooks sold online on Wednesday, ending a longstanding, high-profile case initiated by the US Department of Justice against the tech giant. The result is a major win for the DOJ, but what happens next? According to reports, Apple has stated it would appeal the decision and denied any wrongdoing; Apple spokesperson Tom Neumayr called the allegations against the tech giant “false” and insisted Apple introduced necessary innovation into the market at the time the DOJ accuses the company of antitrust violations. Further, the presiding judge, US District Judge Denise Cote, said she would schedule a damages trial for the 33 states’ attorneys general, which also brought the case against Apple along with federal regulators.
Featured News
Tech Policy and Regulation Weekly Roundup
Jan 23, 2026 by
CPI
Perkins Coie Adds Former DOJ Antitrust Leader as Partner in Washington
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
Ryanair Boss Dismisses Musk’s Buyout as Starlink Feud Escalates
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount Extends Warner Bros Bid as Netflix Rivalry Heats Up
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea Breaks New Ground With Landmark AI Law
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Recidivism
Jan 21, 2026 by
CPI
Recidivism, Multiple Offending, and Serial Offending in Antitrust
Jan 21, 2026 by
Gregory Werden
Antitrust Recidivism: Why Repeat Cases Appear, and Why True Reoffending Is Rare in the United States
Jan 21, 2026 by
Lisa M. Phelan, Megan S. Golden, Adrienne Irmer & Nina Worth
99 Antitrust Problems – Is Recidivism One?
Jan 21, 2026 by
Brian A. Ratner & Kartik S. Madiraju
Holding A Cat by the Tail: A View of Cartel Recidivism in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement
Jan 21, 2026 by
Mark Rosman & KaDee L. Ru