News broke Tuesday that after only a few hours of deliberation, a jury sided with Apple in its defense against a class action lawsuit accusing the company of violated antitrust law through its business practices regarding the iPod; a decision now rests in the hands of a jury.
Closing arguments were held Monday in the case that centered on the purpose of software updates for Apple iPods.
The more than 10-year-old legal battle was launched by a group of iPod purchasers who claim that Apple’s iPod updates were intended to prevent customers from successfully playing songs on the devices that were not downloaded straight from iTunes or a CD. The plaintiffs sought $350 million in damages, an amount that could have been tripled.
But Apple claimed there is “overwhelming” evidence that the iPod software updates were meant to improve product function and consumer experience. “We now have a plaintiff and a case asking you to hold Apple liable for innovating,” a lawyer for the technology conglomerate said during closing arguments.
The eight-person jury reportedly unanimously sided with Apple in deciding that the softwware updates were solely for the purpose of performance improvements.
Plaintiffs had struggled to push forward with their suit; after a decade, the class almost had to abandon the case when it was found that its two lead plaintiffs did not actually qualify to sue Apple for the claims because they did not purchase an iPod during the time in question by the allegations.
Apple’s motion to have the case dismissed entirely, however, failed, and the class found a last-minute lead plaintiff to save the suit. But with the jury’s findings, plaintiffs reportedly plan to appeal the desicion.
Full content: Wall Street Journal
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI