While reports surfaced in previous days that the Department of Justice had settled with the final e-book publisher Macmillan in its price-fixing case, details are just now emerging about what exactly will be the repercussions for Macmillan. According to reports, Macmillan has settled a consumer class action suit for price-fixing, agreeing to pay up to $20 million. While Macmillan is the final e-book publisher to settle with the Department of Justice – leaving Apple Inc. the last entity in the fight with the authority – consumer class actions have yet to be settled with Penguin and Apple, though reports say a trial is scheduled for June of this year. US District Judge Denise Cote, who is overseeing the case, must officially approve of Macmillan’s $20 million settlement, but if done-so, reports say that customers affected by the price-fixing could see payments as soon as this spring.
Now that Apple is the last-remaining body in a longstanding trial brought by the DOJ against e-book price-fixers, speculation is mounting over the implications of Apple’s decision to continue fighting the charges. The DOJ has settled with the remaining five parties, the most recent being publisher Macmillan, and a June 3 date is set for a trial with Apple. According to reports, the Justice Department will not seek monetary damages but instead wants a judicial decree stating Apple violated US antitrust law and barring Apple from making similar agreements with other companies – the DOJ is accusing Apple of making agreements with e-book publishers to keep e-book prices at a certain point. Apple also faces a class action suit brought on by consumers; the Consumer Federation of America estimated last year that the damages of the e-book price fixing amounted to more than $200 million in 2012.
Full Content: Publishers Weekly and Reuters
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
EU Civil Society Groups and Labor Unions Raise Alarm Over Proposed Changes to GDPR
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Regulators Push Back Deadline on UniCredit’s Takeover Bid for Banco BPM
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
Intel Challenges €376 Million EU Fine in Ongoing Antitrust Dispute
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
Red Bull Challenges EU Commission Over Lengthy Antitrust Inspection
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
Live Nation Under Criminal Antitrust Investigation Over Pandemic-Era Refund Policies
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Healthcare Antitrust
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare & Antitrust: What to Expect in the New Trump Administration
May 14, 2025 by
Nana Wilberforce, John W O'Toole & Sarah Pugh
Patent Gaming and Disparagement: Commission Fines Teva For Improperly Protecting Its Blockbuster Medicine
May 14, 2025 by
Blaž Višnar, Boris Andrejaš, Apostolos Baltzopoulos, Rieke Kaup, Laura Nistor & Gianluca Vassallo
Strategic Alliances in the Pharma Sector: An EU Competition Law Perspective
May 14, 2025 by
Christian Ritz & Benedikt Weiss
Monopsony Power in the Hospital Labor Market
May 14, 2025 by
Kevin E. Pflum & Christian Salas