AT&T has officially fired back at the US Justice Department’s (DOJ) lawsuit to block the US$85 billion Time Warner merger and has begun pushing for a trial start date in February 2018.
In AT&T’s lengthy response to the DOJ’s complaint, the company said that the Time Warner deal will be a “pro-competitive, pro-consumer response to an intensely competitive and rapidly changing video marketplace.”
That remark was made in response to claims from the DOJ that AT&T will use its control of Time Warner’s programming to jack up prices for its rival pay TV providers.
“Simply put, no competitor will be eliminated by this merger,” the company said in the filing. Because AT&T claims it is not seeking to buy a company with which it directly competes, the company said, the government “cannot meet its burden of proof” for an antitrust argument.” and/or ““In seeking to block this merger, then, the Government is not only departing from established antitrust precedent, but is also shielding rivals from new competition that would greatly benefit consumers.”
As a remedy to that potential problem, AT&T has offered to submit to baseball-style arbitration with distributors if the deal is approved. That means that, for at least seven years, distributors of Time Warner content including TBS, TNT, CNN and HBO could enter arbitration if the parties can’t agree on terms for wholesale rates. In that event, Turner channels would remain on the distributor while the process plays out.
Full Content: Washington Post
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
US Launches Criminal Antitrust Probe Into TP-Link’s Pricing Practices
Apr 27, 2025 by
CPI
CK Hutchison’s $22.8 Billion Port Sale to BlackRock Draws Chinese Scrutiny
Apr 27, 2025 by
CPI
Fed Withdraws Crypto Guidance, Joins FDIC, OCC in Easing Rules
Apr 27, 2025 by
CPI
EU Investigates Universal Music’s Downtown Deal
Apr 27, 2025 by
CPI
Judge Sets May Hearing to Weigh Antitrust Remedies Against Google
Apr 27, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece