A class action lawsuit, filed Wednesday, accuses 10 of Wall Street’s biggest banks and two trading platforms of conspiring to limit competition in the US$320trn market for interest rate swaps.
The class action lawsuit, filed in US District Court in Manhattan, accuses Goldman Sachs, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Barclays, BNP Paribas, UBS, Deutsche Bank, and the RBS of colluding to prevent the trading of interest rate swaps on electronic exchanges, like those on which stocks are traded.
As a result, the lawsuit alleges, banks have successfully prevented new competition from non banks in the lucrative market for dealing interest rate swaps, the world’s most commonly traded derivative.
The banks “have been able to extract billions of dollars in monopoly rents, year after year, from the class members in this case,” the lawsuit alleges.
The suit was brought by The Public School Teachers’ Pension and Retirement Fund of Chicago, which purchased interest rate swaps from multiple banks to help the hedge against interest rate risk. The plaintiffs are represented by the law firm of Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart, & Sullivan, which has taken the lead in a string of antitrust suits against banks.
As a result of the banks’ collusion, the suit alleges, the Chicago-based fund overpaid for those swaps.
Full content: Fortune
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
New UK Legislation to Combat Ticket Resale and Algorithmic Price-Fixing
Jan 12, 2025 by
CPI
Supreme Court Justices Grill TikTok’s Lawyer in National Security Case
Jan 12, 2025 by
CPI
FTC, DOJ Weigh Antitrust Issues in Musk’s OpenAI Case
Jan 12, 2025 by
CPI
UK Trial Begins as Apple Defends App Store Fees in £1.5 Billion Case
Jan 12, 2025 by
CPI
Italy to Retain Full Control of Data in Potential Deal with Musk’s Starlink
Jan 12, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand