Lawyers are looking to have a case filed in 2008 against major bond insurance and credit ratings companies to be dismissed, arguing that the cities – which claim that companies forced various local governments in California to buy unnecessary insurance – do not have enough evidence to sue. Ambac Financial Group and Moody’s Corp. are among the defendants in the antitrust case, filed on behalf of California cities that say the companies colluded to keep credit ratings high, ultimately creating a dual credit rating scheme that “punished” the cities with lower ratings. A lawyer representing Standard & Poors claims the plaintiffs haven’t “come close” to providing enough evidence.
Featured News
Sources Report Glimmers of Progress in Talks to Resolve Conflicts Over Crypto Market Structure Bill
Jan 9, 2026 by
CPI
CFTC Certifies First Crypto-Native Exchange as a Designated Contract Market
Jan 9, 2026 by
CPI
Glencore and Rio Tinto in Talks Over Deal That Could Create $260 Billion Mining Giant
Jan 8, 2026 by
CPI
Google, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, Netflix Set to Avoid Tough EU Curbs: Report
Jan 8, 2026 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Review of Google-Wiz Deal Draws Intense Scrutiny Ahead of 2026 Deadline
Jan 8, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
Learning from Divergence: The Role of Cross-Country Comparisons in the Evaluation of the DMA
Dec 16, 2025 by
Federico Bruni
New Regulatory Tools for the EU Foreign Direct Investment Screening and Foreign Subsidies Regulation
Dec 16, 2025 by
Ioannis Kokkoris
“Suite Dreams”: Market Definition and Complementarity in the Digital Age
Dec 16, 2025 by
Romain Bizet & Matteo Foschi
The Interaction Between Competition Policy and Consumer Protection: Institutional Design, Behavioral Insights, and Emerging Challenges in Digital Markets
Dec 16, 2025 by
Alessandra Tonazzi