Lawyers are looking to have a case filed in 2008 against major bond insurance and credit ratings companies to be dismissed, arguing that the cities – which claim that companies forced various local governments in California to buy unnecessary insurance – do not have enough evidence to sue. Ambac Financial Group and Moody’s Corp. are among the defendants in the antitrust case, filed on behalf of California cities that say the companies colluded to keep credit ratings high, ultimately creating a dual credit rating scheme that “punished” the cities with lower ratings. A lawyer representing Standard & Poors claims the plaintiffs haven’t “come close” to providing enough evidence.
Featured News
Court Allows Class Action Against Meta Over Facebook Data Breach
Apr 14, 2026 by
CPI
California Lawmakers Clash Over Controversial Antitrust Expansion Bill
Apr 14, 2026 by
CPI
SEC Issues Statement Allowing DeFi Interfaces to Skip Registering as Broker-Dealers
Apr 14, 2026 by
CPI
FTC Set to Enforce Sweeping COPPA Updates Expanding Compliance Burdens
Apr 14, 2026 by
CPI
European Commission Clears Telecom Deals in Italy and Spain
Apr 14, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Competitor Collaborations
Mar 26, 2026 by
CPI
Between Scylla and Charybdis – Navigating Transatlantic Antitrust Currents
Mar 26, 2026 by
Tilman Kuhn & Niklas Brüggemann
Cartel Enforcement Moves Into the Labor Market: Trends and Implications
Mar 26, 2026 by
Andreas Kafetzopoulos & Caroline Janssens
Rethinking Buy-Side Antitrust “Group Boycotts”
Mar 26, 2026 by
Craig Falls & Brendan McGuire
Positive Collaborations: The Tools Available to Competition Authorities to Encourage Beneficial Interactions Between Competitors
Mar 26, 2026 by
Rona Bar-Isaac & Thomas Withers