Closing arguments by American Express Co., Discover Financial Services and Citigroup Inc were heard by a Manhattan judge earlier this week as a major case involving contractual arbitration clauses comes to a close. The three credit card giants are accused of colluding to include the clauses in their contracts with customers, preventing them from banning together in class action filings. Attorneys for the companies told the judge that there was “no proof” of the alleged collusion occurring at meetings, and that the companies had independently decided to include such clauses in their contracts. The plaintiffs argue that meetings attended by the companies provided a stage for the companies to conspire to all include the clauses, as arbitration was discussed at those meetings. The plaintiffs’ lawyer Merrill Davidoff argued there would be no other reason for competing rivals to meet 28 times between 1999 and 2003. According to reports, the issuers all adopted the arbitration clauses, which has lead to a “flourishing of harmful practices” by the companies, said Davidoff.
Featured News
Latham Expands Antitrust Practice With Paris Partner Hire
Sep 20, 2026 by
CPI
China Opens Competition Probes Into Meituan, Alibaba Travel Units
Sep 20, 2026 by
CPI
US Judiciary Prepares New AI Guidance for Federal Courts
Sep 20, 2026 by
CPI
EU Regulators Poised to Block UPM-Sappi Paper Venture
Sep 20, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount Nears Deal With California Officials Over $111 Billion WBD Acquisition
Sep 20, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Computational Antitrust
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
The Next Five Years of Computational Antitrust
Sep 16, 2026 by
Thibault Schrepel
When Two AI Agents Talk: A Gap in Detection Capabilities
Sep 16, 2026 by
Alba Ribera Martinez
When Innovation Competition Has No Product Yet: Making General Innovation Competition Operational
Sep 16, 2026 by
Mariateresa Maggiolino
Computational Antitrust for Complex Adaptive Markets
Sep 16, 2026 by
Filip Lubinski