Court expert Alan O. Sykes, hired to advise on the lawsuit against major credit card companies’ practice of swipe-fees, filed a memorandum Wednesday to Judge John Gleeson outlining his opinion on the challenges plaintiffs face in proving the anticompetitive effects of such fees as well as the damages caused.
In his 51-page memo, Sykes advises the court that retailers suing the credit card companies will likely secure “little or no relief at the conclusion of the trial.”
Further, Sykes said plaintiffs are facing an uphill battle in their efforts to show that swipe-fees “cause anticompetitive harm that outweighs their pro-competitive benefits.” If the plaintiffs were to prove such anticompetitive effects of the interchange fees in question, proving damages would be yet another difficult hurdle to overcome, said the report.
Sykes’ opinion comes as the defendants, credit card giants Visa and MasterCard, passed on an opportunity to drop their record-setting settlement offer. More than one quarter of merchants offered the settlement have opted-out, allowing the defendants the opportunity to drop the multi-billion dollar offer altogether.
The case is Re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation.
The memo was also filed the same week retailers requested, in a separate case, that current rules regarding interchange fees to remain in place as the US Federal Reserve appeals a previous ruling by US District Judge Richard Leon, which found that the central bank incorrectly capped fees at a higher than intended level.
The full memo can be read through the link below.
Additional Content: Bloomberg
Related Content: Interchange Fees: The Economics and Regulation of What Merchants Pay for Cards
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Orders Apple to Address Fortnite App Block or Face Court Hearing
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
EU Civil Society Groups and Labor Unions Raise Alarm Over Proposed Changes to GDPR
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Regulators Push Back Deadline on UniCredit’s Takeover Bid for Banco BPM
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
Intel Challenges €376 Million EU Fine in Ongoing Antitrust Dispute
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
Red Bull Challenges EU Commission Over Lengthy Antitrust Inspection
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Healthcare Antitrust
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare & Antitrust: What to Expect in the New Trump Administration
May 14, 2025 by
Nana Wilberforce, John W O'Toole & Sarah Pugh
Patent Gaming and Disparagement: Commission Fines Teva For Improperly Protecting Its Blockbuster Medicine
May 14, 2025 by
Blaž Višnar, Boris Andrejaš, Apostolos Baltzopoulos, Rieke Kaup, Laura Nistor & Gianluca Vassallo
Strategic Alliances in the Pharma Sector: An EU Competition Law Perspective
May 14, 2025 by
Christian Ritz & Benedikt Weiss
Monopsony Power in the Hospital Labor Market
May 14, 2025 by
Kevin E. Pflum & Christian Salas