A US Court of Appeals in San Francisco has reversed a lower court’s previous ruling that dismissed allegations against several electric companies, reinstating a group of lawsuits accused of price-fixing during California’s energy crisis. Duke Energy Corp., CMS Energy Corp., and other giants in the energy market were freed from allegations that they manipulated prices from 2000 to 2002. The case has been revived, however, as the appeals court has ruled that the US Natural Gas Act does not block state-law antitrust lawsuits concerning energy prices initiated by the buyers of that natural gas. The Act gives the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission jurisdiction over some pricing policies. The consumers argue that the companies reported false data to trade publications which used that data to calculate price indexes used to determine some contracts between buyers and sellers of natural gas.
Featured News
UK Competition Regulator Hit by Further Boardroom Departures
Nov 11, 2025 by
CPI
Parker-Hannifin Bets $9.25 Billion on Industrial Filtration Growth
Nov 11, 2025 by
CPI
Judge Grants Preliminary Approval to Tyson’s $85 Million Pork Price-Fixing Settlement
Nov 11, 2025 by
CPI
Senate Bill to End Shutdown Includes Extension to Cyber-Information Sharing Protections
Nov 11, 2025 by
CPI
Momentum Slowed For State Privacy Legislation in 2025, but Enforcement Ramped Up
Nov 11, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Costs of Consolidation
Oct 26, 2025 by
CPI
Does Merger Enforcement Protect Consumers from the Long-Term Costs of Consolidation?
Oct 26, 2025 by
Diana L. Moss
“Praying for Inflation”: How Market Concentration Facilitates Inflationary Pressures
Oct 26, 2025 by
John Kwoka & Muhammad Shabanpour
Unpacking the Remedy: The Hidden Costs of Merger Remedies and the Economist’s Role in Getting Them Right
Oct 26, 2025 by
Sam R. Carless, Mary Coleman & David Weiskopf
Why Industry Consolidation Causes More Concern Than It Should
Oct 26, 2025 by
Michael Noel