A US Court of Appeals in San Francisco has reversed a lower court’s previous ruling that dismissed allegations against several electric companies, reinstating a group of lawsuits accused of price-fixing during California’s energy crisis. Duke Energy Corp., CMS Energy Corp., and other giants in the energy market were freed from allegations that they manipulated prices from 2000 to 2002. The case has been revived, however, as the appeals court has ruled that the US Natural Gas Act does not block state-law antitrust lawsuits concerning energy prices initiated by the buyers of that natural gas. The Act gives the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission jurisdiction over some pricing policies. The consumers argue that the companies reported false data to trade publications which used that data to calculate price indexes used to determine some contracts between buyers and sellers of natural gas.
Featured News
Fox News Seeks Dismissal of Newsmax Antitrust Case in Florida
May 10, 2026 by
CPI
India Orders Antitrust Probe Into Pernod Ricard Over Retail Practices
May 10, 2026 by
CPI
Ace Hardware Faces Federal Lawsuit Alleging Nationwide Price-Fixing Scheme
May 10, 2026 by
CPI
EU Grants Google More Time in Ongoing Digital Competition Probe
May 10, 2026 by
CPI
DOJ, States Reach Antitrust Deal With Agri Stats Aimed at Lowering Meat Prices
May 10, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Unilateral Effects
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
A Net Present Value Approach to Merger Analysis
Apr 28, 2026 by
Joseph J Simons & Malcolm Coate
Generative AI and Competitive Disruption: Increasingly Relevant for Merger Analysis?
Apr 28, 2026 by
Andrea Coscelli, Emily Chissell, Nitika Bagaria & Tega Akati-Udi
Non-Price Unilateral Effects In Media Mergers
Apr 28, 2026 by
Lapo Filistrucchi & Teresa Oriani
Ecosystem Mergers and Unilateral Effects? A Framework for Assessing the Ecosystem Theory of Harm
Apr 28, 2026 by
Ethel Fonseca, George Tucker & Helder Vasconcelos