Actavis Plc urged a U.S. appeals court on Monday to allow it to discontinue a top-selling Alzheimer’s drug in favor of a pricier extended-release version, a move that New York’s attorney general has said would suppress generic competition.
A three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals peppered attorneys for Actavis and for the attorney general with questions, although the judges gave no clear indication of how they would rule.
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman filed an antitrust lawsuit against Dublin-based Actavis last year in Manhattan federal court after the company said it was planning to discontinue Namenda IR in favor of Namenda XR. The two drugs have the same active ingredient, but Namenda XR is taken once daily instead of twice.
The lawsuit claimed that by forcing patients to switch to the new version, Actavis hoped to stave off competition from drug maker.
Full Content: Houston Chronicle
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI