A Pennsylvania paving company was cleared of a bid-rigging suit filed against it by a federal judge, despite finding that the company did form a monopoly. According to reports, Emmaus paving company was cleared of all charges by US District Judge Cynthia M. Rufe, despite finding that Asphalt Maintenance Solutions of Emmaus did not create a monopoly when it established contracts to distribute paving products. The deals did, however, prevent successful bids by its rivals. The Judge found the event to be legal, citing a 1961 Supreme Court precedence. The lawsuit was filed last May and alleged that Emmaus secured bids to specific companies for road paving projects in several municipalities.
Featured News
Federal Antitrust Suit Targeting Aircraft Engine Sales Practices Is Settled
Dec 31, 2025 by
CPI
CFTC Withdraws Guidance on ‘Actual Delivery’ in Crypto Transactions, Leaving Regulatory Void
Dec 31, 2025 by
CPI
Coalition of State AGs Push Back Against FCC Proposal Seeking to Preempt State AI Laws
Dec 31, 2025 by
CPI
Apple Seeks to Overturn £1.5 Billion UK App Store Antitrust Ruling
Dec 31, 2025 by
CPI
Age-Restriction Laws Are Proliferating; So Too Are the Difficult Tradeoffs Policymakers Face
Dec 23, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
Learning from Divergence: The Role of Cross-Country Comparisons in the Evaluation of the DMA
Dec 16, 2025 by
Federico Bruni
New Regulatory Tools for the EU Foreign Direct Investment Screening and Foreign Subsidies Regulation
Dec 16, 2025 by
Ioannis Kokkoris
“Suite Dreams”: Market Definition and Complementarity in the Digital Age
Dec 16, 2025 by
Romain Bizet & Matteo Foschi
The Interaction Between Competition Policy and Consumer Protection: Institutional Design, Behavioral Insights, and Emerging Challenges in Digital Markets
Dec 16, 2025 by
Alessandra Tonazzi