As news broke this week that the US International Trade Commission has sided with Samsung, the tech giant that accused Apple Inc. of infringing on its patents with the iPhone 4, the major question now remains of whether President Barack Obama will let the ruling – which bans imports of the iPhone 4, as well as other older models of the iPhone and iPad, into the US – stick, or if he will veto it. According to reports, the decision by the International Trade Commission is particularly troublesome, as Congress has previously come to the consensus that standard essential patent holders like Samsung should not be able to seek important bans from the ICT and violate their promise to license those patents under FRAND terms. The ICT’s decision also comes in the same week President Obama announced patent reform proposals.
Featured News
California Pushing Back Against Federal Preemption of Its Privacy Laws
May 7, 2026 by
CPI
Rave Sues Apple in Antitrust Case Over App Store Removal
May 7, 2026 by
CPI
Trivago Files Antitrust Case Against Google in Germany Over Search Practices
May 7, 2026 by
CPI
A New Idea Is Gaining Ground: Tax AI Computing Power to Offset Job Losses
May 7, 2026 by
CPI
Morocco Competition Authority Opens Antitrust Probe Into Luxury Beauty Market
May 7, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Unilateral Effects
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
A Net Present Value Approach to Merger Analysis
Apr 28, 2026 by
Joseph J Simons & Malcolm Coate
Generative AI and Competitive Disruption: Increasingly Relevant for Merger Analysis?
Apr 28, 2026 by
Andrea Coscelli, Emily Chissell, Nitika Bagaria & Tega Akati-Udi
Non-Price Unilateral Effects In Media Mergers
Apr 28, 2026 by
Lapo Filistrucchi & Teresa Oriani
Ecosystem Mergers and Unilateral Effects? A Framework for Assessing the Ecosystem Theory of Harm
Apr 28, 2026 by
Ethel Fonseca, George Tucker & Helder Vasconcelos