The OTI urged the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to take action to improve broadband competition in multi-tenant environments (MTEs) such as apartment buildings.
In comments submitted to the agency, OTI outlined how internet providers broker kickbacks and other deals with property owners that block competitors from accessing the building. These anti-competitive agreements create de facto monopolies for the building’s tenants. OTI has long criticized these deals as a contributor to the United States’ high broadband prices and lack of competition.
The FCC tried to prohibit these deals in a 2008 rulemaking, but internet providers have since found ways to circumvent those efforts. In July, President Biden issued an executive order that called on the FCC to ban these sweetheart deals and close loopholes.
Joshua Stager, deputy director of broadband and competition policy at New America’s Open Technology Institute said “For too long, monopoly-minded internet providers have colluded with property owners to restrict choice and raise broadband prices in apartment buildings. These sweetheart deals are one of the reasons the broadband market is so anticompetitive, particularly in urban areas. We need regulations that end these schemes. Home internet is an essential service, so the FCC should ensure tenants are getting the choice, affordability, and freedom they deserve.”
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Former DOJ Antitrust Chief Megan Lewis Joins McGuireWoods as Partner
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh