U.S. Federal Appeals Court Rules in Favor of FTC in Case Against Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.
Appeals Court Upholds FTC Opinion That 2001 Acquisition of Pitt-Des Moines was Anticompetitive
From the FTC Release:
(Link to the entire release available in the column on the left)
In a decision announced today [Friday, January 25], the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled in favor of the Federal Trade Commission, denying a petition by Chicago Bridge & Iron Company (CB&I) to review an administrative FTC opinion that CB&I illegally acquired certain assets of Pitt-Des Moines, Inc. (PDM) in February 2001, during a pending FTC investigation. The Circuit Court’s ruling ends litigation in the case against CB&I and upholds the FTC’s administrative opinion that the acquisition substantially lessened competition in four relevant markets for industrial storage tanks in the United States.
According to the Circuit Court decision, the FTC correctly applied the legal standards of burdens of proof and persuasion in its 2005 administrative opinion, properly analyzed the “potential entry†defense, and had substantial evidence to conclude that “potential entry†evidence was insufficient to rebut the prima facie case against the respondents. In addition, the Court found that the Commission relied on substantial evidence for its factual findings and that it did not abuse its discretion in issuing the remedy provisions, calling them “not overbroad nor punitive.†Finally, the Court found that a separate evidentiary hearing was not required in this case, as claimed by CB&I, and that the Commission “did not abuse its discretion†in denying CB&I’s request for a rehearing and an additional evidentiary hearing on the remedy the Commission would impose.
Featured News
Italy’s Antitrust Regulator Investigates State Railway Operators for Market Abuse
Mar 23, 2025 by
CPI
Democrats Urge Trump to Reinstate Ousted FTC Commissioners
Mar 23, 2025 by
CPI
White House-Led Talks Focus on U.S. Investor Takeover of TikTok
Mar 23, 2025 by
CPI
Oregon Lawmakers Target Algorithmic Price-Fixing in Rental Market
Mar 23, 2025 by
CPI
New Merger Disclosure Rules Double Review Time, Complicate Deal Process
Mar 23, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li