A recent decision by the US Supreme Court may lead to increased legal action within the healthcare sector, says one expert. Federal Trade Commission deputy assistant director Sara Razi suggested that the Court’s decision, made last February, strengthened federal antitrust lawyers when clarifying when state antitrust law can trump federal; the Court unanimously agreed that “state-action immunity is disfavored” in FTC vs. Phoebe Putney Health System. The FTC sued the health group over a merger, approved by Georgia’s state hospital regulators. According to Razi, the ruling was “manna from heaven” and suggested that the Court’s ruling demonstrated unity between liberals and conservatives when it comes to federal antitrust exemptions. According to Razi, this may lead to more legal action taken within the healthcare sector as federals find the support of Supreme Court precedence.
Full Content: Thomson Reuters
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Turkey Hits Meta with $37.20 Million Fine Over Data-Sharing Practices
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI