A group of flexible foam companies found to have conspired to fix prices could face up to $9 billion in fines unless the US Supreme Court steps in, say reports.
The dispute stems from a ruling by the US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, which allowed separate classes of direct and indirect purchasers of polyurethane foam to sue for damages from the foam companies found to have violated antitrust law. But the defendants, which include Woodbridge Foam and Carpenter, have appealed the decision to the Supreme Court, claiming that if the various class actions are allowed to proceed they could face up to $9 billion in fines, paid out to “millions of class members with nothing in common other than the fact that they purchased products containing polyurethane foam.”
The standards for certifying each separate class, the companies argue, are incompatible with each other.
According to reports, Dow Chemical submitted documents to the Supreme Court in favor of Woodbridge et al. The chemical conglomerate is also said to be planning its own appeal to the Court to overturn an antitrust fine for its alleged role in price-fixing chemicals used in the foam.
Full Content: Rubber News
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Australia’s Major Supermarkets Face Scrutiny Over Profit Margins Amid Rising Prices
Mar 21, 2025 by
CPI
Fired FTC Commissioners Warn of Potential White House Influence Over Mergers
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Dr. Matthew Backus Joins Compass Lexecon as an Affiliate
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
UK to Boost Broadband Competition While Capping Openreach Charges, Says Ofcom
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Singapore Competition Watchdog Yet to Receive Formal Notification on Grab-GoTo Merger
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li