Samsung’s former Chief Executive Officer took the stand Monday to testify on behalf of his company to defend against the latest patent feud with rival Apple, a move aimed at debunking Apple’s previous claims that Samsung appeared indifferent to a 2012 case when Samsung did not have a senior executive testify.
Dale Sohn served as Samsung’s CEO up until last year to defend the company against Apple’s claims that Samsung’s Galaxy phones infringed on Apple patents. It’s only the latest in a slew of patent litigation between the companies; Apple, which seeks $2 billion in damages in the current case, sued Samsung in 2012 and was awarded more than $1 billion in damages on claims Samsung infringed on iPhone design patents.
This time, the companies are challenging each others’ software functions. Apple says 10 Samsung products violate five Apple patents regarding interface designs, including the slide-to-unlock characteristic.
Sohn’s testimony Monday aimed to outline the differences in the companies’ business models and explain why he did not testify in the 2012 case, so as to block Apple from using the same argument this time around.
”I felt a bit uncomfortable,” Sohn told the jurors about his lack of appearance in 2012. “Now I have become more comfortable with this case, so I decided to speak English.”
The companies have been engaged in, or are currently fighting, cases on four continents over each others’ smartphone patents.
Full Content: Bloomberg
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Federal Judge Orders Google to Open Android App Store Amid Antitrust Pressure
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Greenlights FTC’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against Amazon, Tosses Some State Claims
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court Rejects Uber and Lyft’s Appeal in California Gig Worker Suits
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court Sidesteps 5-Hour Energy Pricing Case, Allowing Antitrust Claims to Proceed
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Tempur Sealy and Mattress Firm Argue FTC Proceedings Are Unconstitutional in New Suit
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh