The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and a putative class of cellphone purchasers asked a California federal court to request help from the Finnish government in securing documents from Nokia in parallel litigations over Qualcomm’s patent licensing practices, a day after Qualcomm made a similar request for its defense.
According to Law360 on Monday, November 6, a California federal court ruled that the FTC and Qualcomm are allowed to request request documents from a Finnish government agency in a lawsuit over patent licensing practices.
The FTC and the purchasers are both embroiled in lawsuits alleging Qualcomm Inc. used its dominance in the market for baseband processors in order to wrangle higher royalties and anti-competitive licensing terms from cellphone makers for its standard-essential patents. They filed a joint motion on Tuesday seeking international judicial assistance in procuring evidence from the Finland-based electronics and telecommunications company Nokia Corp., while Qualcomm issued a similar request in the FTC’s case on Monday.
The FTC and the purchasers said that Nokia, like Qualcomm, has agreed to license its standard-essential patents on fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory, or FRAND, terms and that the documents they are requesting could shed light on Qualcomm’s alleged conduct and its effects.
“Nokia likely possesses documents relevant to plaintiffs’ claims that Qualcomm uses monopoly power in baseband processor markets to distort licensing negotiations and extract license terms that disadvantage Qualcomm’s competitors, including documents which may show that Qualcomm’s licensing policies are anomalous among SEP licensors,” the motion said.
Full Content: Law 360
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
House Budget Bill’s Moratorium on State AI Laws Could Undo A Range of Tech Regs, Critics Say
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Microsoft Nears EU Antitrust Resolution Over Teams Bundling, Sources Say
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
CMA Investigates Aviva’s £3.6B Acquisition of Direct Line Group
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Google Urges Texas Judge to Disregard Virginia Antitrust Ruling
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Anthropic Ordered to Respond After AI Allegedly Fabricates Citation in Legal Filing
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Healthcare Antitrust
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare & Antitrust: What to Expect in the New Trump Administration
May 14, 2025 by
Nana Wilberforce, John W O'Toole & Sarah Pugh
Patent Gaming and Disparagement: Commission Fines Teva For Improperly Protecting Its Blockbuster Medicine
May 14, 2025 by
Blaž Višnar, Boris Andrejaš, Apostolos Baltzopoulos, Rieke Kaup, Laura Nistor & Gianluca Vassallo
Strategic Alliances in the Pharma Sector: An EU Competition Law Perspective
May 14, 2025 by
Christian Ritz & Benedikt Weiss
Monopsony Power in the Hospital Labor Market
May 14, 2025 by
Kevin E. Pflum & Christian Salas