The US Federal Trade Commission announced an agreement has been reached with a hospital authority in Georgia and Phoebe Putney Health System regarding the healthcare group’s buyout of a hospital. According to the regulator, while a settlement has been reached between the parties that includes the two must notify the FTC of any future transactions and prevents the exclusion of potential entrants into the local market.
The watchdog is limited, however, in its options. While the regulator would have preferred to require hospital divestures of the health system company, the state has “unique” Certificate of Need laws that prevent any forced sales. The FTC therefore could not require the hospitals to become independent competition in the market.
The FTC opened its case against the parties following Phoebe Putney’s acquisition of the Palmyra Park Hospital; a review of the deal found threats to competition in six counties in the state. Despite the limitations, a statement by the FTC’s Director of the Bureau of Competition Deborah Feinstein described the settlement as a victory following the US Supreme Court’s ruling that the hospital buy could be reviewed by federal authorities, limiting the scope of state-level antitrust immunity. “Regrettably,” said Feinstein, “that legal victory will not undo the acquisition’s clear harm to competition.”
Full Content: My South West GA
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh