The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chairman Joseph Simons told lawmakers Wednesday, July 18, that he will look at the European Union’s move to fine Google US$5 billion for antitrust violations pertaining to the Android mobile operating system.
Reuters, citing comments Simons made during a hearing in front of lawmakers, reported the FTC head said he spoke with European Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager about the fine earlier in the week. “We’re going to read what the EU put out very closely,” Simons told a subcommittee of the House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee, according to Reuters. When asked about the control Google and Apple have over the smartphone industry, Simons said that markets that are dominated by a small number of companies are where antitrust issues often arise. “There are the two of them, so they compete pretty heavily against each other,” said Simons, according to Reuters.
The EU fine stems from an inquiry by antitrust regulators at the European Union into whether or not Google abused its position with the Android OS, which is on more than 80% of the smartphones around the globe, by favoring its own mobile apps and services including its search engine. Google has the right to appeal the fine. Google argues that its OS, which manufacturers don’t have to pay to install on mobile devices, actually boosted competition among smartphones and resulted in lower prices. It also said the allegation that it hurt third-party apps by highlighting its own is untrue because manufactures install all sorts of apps on the devices and consumers have the option to download any apps they want.
Last year the EU fined Google €2.4 billion when EU officials determined Google cooked its search results so as to benefit its own shopping services, and disadvantage the services of others. Apart from the hefty fine, the EC gave Google 90 days to “stop its illegal conduct” and offer other price comparison services the chance to compete on a balanced playing field. “Google’s strategy for its comparison-shopping service wasn’t just about attracting customers by making its product better than those of its rivals,” said Vestager said at the time. “It denied other companies the chance to compete on the merits and to innovate. And most importantly, it denied European consumers a genuine choice of services.”
Full Content: PYMNTS
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
DOJ Antitrust Chief Gail Slater Assembles Veteran Team for Key Cases
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
UK Demands Access to Apple’s Encrypted Cloud Data, Spark Legal and Privacy Battle
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Turkey Probes Netflix, Disney+, and Amazon Over Anti-Competitive Practices
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Elon Musk and OpenAI Agree to Accelerate Trial Amidst Legal Battle Over AI’s For-Profit Shift
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
AI in Markets: A Double-Edged Sword for Competition, Says CCI Chief
Mar 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li