The New America Foundation, a prominent Washington, DC think tank that’s heavily funded by Google, has parted ways with one of its most influential scholars after he criticized Google’s growing monopoly power.
The scholar is Barry Lynn, founder of New America’s Open Markets program and a leading advocate of stricter enforcement of antitrust laws. In June, Barry Lynn, who was a scholar at New America, posted a statement praising the European Union’s record US$2.7 billion fine against Google. Lynn ran a team, Open Markets, that researched competition policy and was increasingly critical of giants like Google and Amazon.
Google executive chairman and former CEO Eric Schmidt criticized Lynn’s statement to the think tank’s CEO, Anne-Marie Slaughter, according to The New York Times.
The statement reportedly disappeared from the think tank website but returned hours later. According to the Times, word of Schmidt’s displeasure spread across the think tank.
Slaughter fired Lynn days later, saying in an email obtained by the Times that “the time has come for Open Markets and New America to part ways.” Slaughter told Lynn in an email that his firing was “in no way based on the content of your work” but said he was “imperiling the institution as a whole.”
Lynn told the Times he believed his dismissal was because he criticized Google.
“Google is very aggressive in throwing its money around Washington and Brussels, and then pulling the strings,” Lynn told the Times. “People are so afraid of Google now.”
In a tweet, Slaughter called the Times story “false” and said the think tank would publish a full statement later Wednesday, August 30.
Shortly after The New America Foundation published a statement in response to the Times article. In the release, Slaughter patently denies any accusation that “Google lobbied New America to expel the Open Markets program because of this press release.” She writes that Lynn’s “repeated refusal to adhere to New America’s standards of openness and institutional collegiality meant that we could no longer work together as part of the same institution.”
A Google representative also said, “We support hundreds of organizations that promote a free and open Internet, greater access to information, and increased opportunity. We don’t agree with every group 100% of the time, and while we sometimes respectfully disagree, we respect each group’s independence, personnel decisions, and policy perspectives.”
Full Content: New York Times
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Mehta Questions Both Sides in Landmark Google Antitrust Case
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FCC Urges Urgent Funding for Removal of Chinese Telecom Equipment from U.S. Networks
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Former Pioneer CEO Facing Potential Criminal Charges For Colluding With OPEC
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Regulator Greenlights K-Pop Powerhouse Deal
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Exxon’s Pioneer Purchase Approved, Former CEO Barred from Board
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI