US-based healthcare conglomerates UPMC and Highmark Inc. have each dropped their lawsuits on order from a federal judge, say reports.
US District Judge Joy Flowers Conti ordered Highmark to drop its 2009 lawsuit, countered by Highmark’s 2012 lawsuit, also ordered to be dropped. The companies had sued each other over claims of monopolistic conduct.
The judge ordered the cases to be abandoned by the end of 2013, and dismissed with prejudice – without the opportunity of refilling.
According to reports, however, Highmark is not ruling out another lawsuit against UPMC for similar claims of monopolistic behavior in the future.
Full Content: Post-Gazette
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Rio Tinto to Acquire U.S.-Based Arcadium Lithium in $6.7 Billion Deal
Oct 9, 2024 by
CPI
Biden Administration Warns of Price Gouging Risks Ahead of Hurricane Milton’s Landfall
Oct 9, 2024 by
CPI
Cleveland-Cliffs Clears Regulatory Hurdle in Stelco Acquisition
Oct 9, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Showdown: Google Confronts Threats to Its Business in App Distribution, Search, and Advertising
Oct 9, 2024 by
CPI
X Returns to Brazil After Supreme Court Ruling Clears Path
Oct 9, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh