The bill, passed with a decisive vote of 352-65 and backed by bipartisan support, underscores growing concerns about national security implications associated with foreign-owned apps, particularly those from China. Despite its success in the House, the legislation faces a more uncertain path in the Senate, where there are varying opinions on the best approach to regulating such apps. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has confirmed that the Senate will review the bill, reported Reuters.
TikTok, boasting approximately 170 million American users, has become a focal point of debate in Washington. Lawmakers report receiving a deluge of calls from teenage TikTok users voicing opposition to the legislation, with the volume of complaints sometimes surpassing those concerning major international conflicts.
Related: Legislation to Force ByteDance Divestment of TikTok Gains Momentum
Responding to the House’s decision, a TikTok spokesperson criticized the process as secretive and characterized the bill as a ban. They expressed hope that the Senate would take into account the perspectives of constituents and carefully consider the facts before making a decision.
The bill represents the latest in a series of actions by the U.S. government aimed at addressing national security concerns related to China. From connected vehicles to advanced artificial intelligence chips to infrastructure projects like cranes at U.S. ports, policymakers are increasingly focused on mitigating potential risks associated with Chinese involvement in critical sectors.
Prominent figures within Congress have emphasized the urgency of the issue. No. 2 House Republican Steve Scalise labeled it a “critical national security issue,” urging the Senate to swiftly take up the legislation. However, Senate Commerce Committee chair Maria Cantwell, who will play a pivotal role in shaping the Senate’s response, expressed a desire for legislation that could withstand legal challenges and indicated consideration of alternative approaches.
As the fate of TikTok hangs in the balance, the spotlight remains firmly fixed on Capitol Hill, where debates over national security, foreign ownership, and the regulation of digital platforms converge in what promises to be a significant legislative showdown.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Top Antitrust Expert Joins Cravath from Paul Weiss
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
CMA Chief Removed as UK Government Targets Regulatory Overhaul
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
Court Denies Dismissal in Crab Price-Fixing Lawsuit
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
TikTok Stays Online for Now: Trump Floats US Ownership Deal
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
Hong Kong Watchdog Unveils Compliance Tool for Small Businesses
Jan 21, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Pharmacy Benefit Managers
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Untangling the PBM Mess
Jan 20, 2025 by
Kent Bernard
Using Data, Not Anecdotes, to Analyze Criticisms of Pharmacy Benefit Managers
Jan 20, 2025 by
Dennis Carlton
Vertical Integration and PBMs: What, Me Worry?
Jan 20, 2025 by
Lawton Robert Burns & Bradley Fluegel
The Economics of Benefit Management in Prescription-Drug Markets
Jan 20, 2025 by
Casey B. Mulligan