Just two days after the US Supreme Court offered its decision in Comcast v. Behrend, which upped the requirements for class action certification, Intel Corp. has cited the Court’s ruling in its own antitrust case. Intel is accused of abusing its dominant position in the microprocessor market, barring rivals from entering competition. Plaintiffs are seeking class action certification, but Intel has used the very recent Supreme Court ruling to argue that – as was found in the case against Comcast – that customers have not offered consistent theories in regards to their allegations. If class certification is granted in the Intel case, the company faces millions of computer consumers whose products included the chips.
Featured News
SpaceX Strikes $40 Billion Apollo Deal to Accelerate AI Expansion
Oct 26, 2026 by
CPI
Air Canada, United Seek Wider Antitrust Immunity for Cross-Border Flights
Oct 26, 2026 by
CPI
Meta Faces European Publisher Backlash Over AI Content Scraping Rules
Oct 26, 2026 by
CPI
ICE’s $6 Billion MarketAxess Takeover Advances After US Antitrust Clearance
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
McCormick’s $44.8 Billion Unilever Food Deal Clears Key US Antitrust Hurdle
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Exclusive Dealing
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
Exclusive Dealing Without Exclusivity: Screening Contracts, Loyalty Rebates, and the Limits of Antitrust Tests
Oct 25, 2026 by
David Martimort & Jérôme Pouyet
When Competition for Exclusivity Raises Prices: Rebates, Pricing Rules, and the Insulin Puzzle
Oct 25, 2026 by
Daniel P. O’Brien & Greg Shaffer
Why Leaving the Door Open Can Be (Much) Worse Than Closing It: Share-Based Requirements, Buyer-Specific Costs, and Foreclosure
Oct 25, 2026 by
Zhijun Chen & Greg Shaffer
Antitrust Chronicle® – EU Merger Guidelines
Oct 19, 2026 by
CPI