Just two days after the US Supreme Court offered its decision in Comcast v. Behrend, which upped the requirements for class action certification, Intel Corp. has cited the Court’s ruling in its own antitrust case. Intel is accused of abusing its dominant position in the microprocessor market, barring rivals from entering competition. Plaintiffs are seeking class action certification, but Intel has used the very recent Supreme Court ruling to argue that – as was found in the case against Comcast – that customers have not offered consistent theories in regards to their allegations. If class certification is granted in the Intel case, the company faces millions of computer consumers whose products included the chips.
Featured News
Ohio Attorney General Files Antitrust Lawsuit Against Major Cannabis Operators
Feb 8, 2026 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
South Korea Accuses DB Group of Concealing Affiliates to Preserve Family Control
Feb 8, 2026 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Creditors Seek Dismissal of Optimum’s Antitrust Lawsuit Amid Debt Restructuring Fight
Feb 8, 2026 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
DOJ May Launch Probe Into US Homebuilders as Housing Costs Soar
Feb 8, 2026 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Israel Antitrust Authority Plans Record Fine Against El Al Over Wartime Airfares
Feb 8, 2026 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Hub-&-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
CPI
A Data Analytics Company as the Hub in a Hub-and-Spoke Cartel
Jan 26, 2026 by
Joseph Harrington
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Jan 26, 2026 by
Patrick Van Cayseele
Hub-and-Spoke Collusion or Vertical Exclusion? Identifying the Rim in Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz, Pedro Gonzaga, Laura Ildefonso & Albert Metz
The Algorithmic Middleman in a Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy: Divergent Court Decisions and the Expanding Patchwork of State and Local Regulations
Jan 26, 2026 by
Bradley C. Weber