Jackson Hewitt has asked a federal judge in New Jersey to dismiss claims that agreements between the company and its franchisees not to poach each other’s workers violated federal antitrust law, saying brand parents and franchisees are “legally incapable” of an anticompetitive conspiracy.
The tax preparation company claimed that unlike competing businesses, franchisors and franchisees share economic interests and agreements between them do not have the anticompetitive effects prohibited by the Sherman Antitrust Act, in a motion filed on Tuesday, May 28.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google’s Bid to End EU Antitrust Case with AdX Sale Rejected by Publishers
Sep 18, 2024 by
CPI
Google Challenges £7 Billion UK Lawsuit, Seeks Case Dismissal Over Alleged Market Abuse
Sep 18, 2024 by
CPI
GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen Fined Nearly $1M for Antitrust Violation in Wells Fargo Deal
Sep 18, 2024 by
CPI
French Regulator Approves FDJ’s Kindred €2.45B Acquisition with Conditions
Sep 18, 2024 by
CPI
UK Competition Authority Targets Greenwashing with New Fashion Compliance Rules
Sep 18, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Canada & Mexico
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competitive Convergence: Mexico’s 30-Year Quest for Antitrust Parity with its Northern Neighbor
Sep 3, 2024 by
Francisco Javier Núñez Melgoza
Competition and Digital Markets in North America: A Comparative Study of Antitrust Investigations in Mexico and the United States
Sep 3, 2024 by
Julio Garcia
Recent Antitrust Development in Mexico: COFECE’s Preliminary Report on Amazon and Mercado Libre
Sep 3, 2024 by
Alejandra Palacios Prieto
The Cost of Making COFECE Disappear
Sep 3, 2024 by
Mateo Fernández