JPMorgan Chase & Co has reportedly won its request to have a case accusing the bank of colluding to drive the price of silver down. The case, initiated by investors across the country, was dismissed on Monday by US District Judge Robert Patterson in Manhattan, who decided that the investors did not show JP Morgan abused its ability to influence silver prices nor that it “intended to cause artificial prices to exist.” At least 43 complaints were filed by the investors in 2010 and 2011; the complaints accused banks of price-fixing silver, leading to hundreds of millions of dollars in profit. JPMorgan was joined by 20 other unnamed individuals as defendants after HSBC Holdings Plc was dropped from the case.
Featured News
SpaceX Strikes $40 Billion Apollo Deal to Accelerate AI Expansion
Oct 26, 2026 by
CPI
Air Canada, United Seek Wider Antitrust Immunity for Cross-Border Flights
Oct 26, 2026 by
CPI
Meta Faces European Publisher Backlash Over AI Content Scraping Rules
Oct 26, 2026 by
CPI
ICE’s $6 Billion MarketAxess Takeover Advances After US Antitrust Clearance
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
McCormick’s $44.8 Billion Unilever Food Deal Clears Key US Antitrust Hurdle
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Exclusive Dealing
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
Exclusive Dealing Without Exclusivity: Screening Contracts, Loyalty Rebates, and the Limits of Antitrust Tests
Oct 25, 2026 by
David Martimort & Jérôme Pouyet
When Competition for Exclusivity Raises Prices: Rebates, Pricing Rules, and the Insulin Puzzle
Oct 25, 2026 by
Daniel P. O’Brien & Greg Shaffer
Why Leaving the Door Open Can Be (Much) Worse Than Closing It: Share-Based Requirements, Buyer-Specific Costs, and Foreclosure
Oct 25, 2026 by
Zhijun Chen & Greg Shaffer
Antitrust Chronicle® – EU Merger Guidelines
Oct 19, 2026 by
CPI