A federal judge ruled on Monday that a $37 billion merger between the health insurance providers Aetna and Humana should not be consummated on antitrust grounds, siding with the Justice Department, which had been seeking to block the deal.
Featured News
General Mills, Mars Accuse Major Sugar Producers of Price-Fixing
Sep 8, 2026 by
CPI
Amazon Seeks to Exclude Big Sellers From Automatic £2.7 Billion UK Class Action
Sep 8, 2026 by
CPI
Tamarack, Headwater Agree to C$10 Billion Canadian Energy Merger
Sep 8, 2026 by
CPI
Google Overhauls European Search to Comply With EU Competition Rules
Sep 8, 2026 by
CPI
MMG Faces EU Antitrust Warning Over Anglo American Nickel Deal
Sep 8, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – State Attorneys General
Aug 27, 2026 by
CPI
CPI Talks… with Jonathan Skrmetti, Attorney General of Tennessee
Aug 27, 2026 by
Jonathan Skrmetti
What the Live Nation Jury Instructions Tell Us About California’s Unfair Competition Law
Aug 27, 2026 by
Henry Hauser, Brent Nakamura, Ashley Kaplan, Brian Wang & Cari Jeffries
From Backroom Deals to Public Scrutiny: The Tunney Act’s Past, Present, and Future
Aug 27, 2026 by
Christina M. Black & Ashley A. Locke
Understanding the Fragility of Economic Concentration Through the Principles of Ecology
Aug 27, 2026 by
Alexandra Spring
The court “mostly agrees” with the government’s argument that the deal would lessen competition for Medicare Advantage plans and health insurance sold on public exchanges, Judge John D. Bates of the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia said in the ruling.