US District Judge Denise Cote, who recently presided over the high profile Apple eBooks price-fixing case, ruled in favor of Internet music streaming service Pandora in a decision that stretches the breadth of a previously-established antitrust consent decree.
Reports say Judge Cote rejected a case launched by various music publishers looking to narrow a license given to Pandora. The existing decree, requiring the American Society of Composers, Authors & Publishers to allow Pandora to play its works from 2011 to 2015, was found to “unambiguously” cover all of its music.
Further, said Judge Cote, the decree covers the licensing of all of the society’s pieces even if music publishers seek to take back the authority to license “new media” services, say reports.
Pandora is simultaneously involved in another case regarding the legal definition of “reasonable” licensing fees; Just Cote scheduled a December trial for that case.
Full Content: Reuters
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI