A federal judge has suggested that plaintiffs’ lawyers should seek a court order to force Facebook COO Sheryl Sanderg to cooperate in a case accusing seven technology conglomerates of breaching federal antitrust law. US District Judge Lucy H. Koh wants lawyers to “bring to a close” the delays preventing Sandberg’s deposition as her lawyers resisted a subpoena; Judge Koh set a hearing to resolve the situation after learning a hearing intended for the same purposes never took place last month as scheduled. Neither Facebook nor Sandberg is a defendant, but lawyers would like to interview her concerning her time as an executive at Google Inc. Defendants also include Apple, Intel and Adobe Systems and are accused of generating non-compete, non-solicitation agreements, resulting in harm to competition.
Featured News
California Pushing Back Against Federal Preemption of Its Privacy Laws
May 7, 2026 by
CPI
Rave Sues Apple in Antitrust Case Over App Store Removal
May 7, 2026 by
CPI
Trivago Files Antitrust Case Against Google in Germany Over Search Practices
May 7, 2026 by
CPI
A New Idea Is Gaining Ground: Tax AI Computing Power to Offset Job Losses
May 7, 2026 by
CPI
Morocco Competition Authority Opens Antitrust Probe Into Luxury Beauty Market
May 7, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Unilateral Effects
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
A Net Present Value Approach to Merger Analysis
Apr 28, 2026 by
Joseph J Simons & Malcolm Coate
Generative AI and Competitive Disruption: Increasingly Relevant for Merger Analysis?
Apr 28, 2026 by
Andrea Coscelli, Emily Chissell, Nitika Bagaria & Tega Akati-Udi
Non-Price Unilateral Effects In Media Mergers
Apr 28, 2026 by
Lapo Filistrucchi & Teresa Oriani
Ecosystem Mergers and Unilateral Effects? A Framework for Assessing the Ecosystem Theory of Harm
Apr 28, 2026 by
Ethel Fonseca, George Tucker & Helder Vasconcelos