Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt had the support of 21 other states in his request for the US Supreme Court to back Kansas’ state laws against price-fixing, rules that the federal government is challenging, according to reports.
AG Schmidt filed an amicus curiae brief that seeks SCOTUS protection of the Kansas laws that bar retailers from fixing the price of natural gas. Federal officials have challenged the rules on grounds that they are preempted by the federal Natural Gas Act, and that the preemption extends to the retail market when natural gas sales involve federally regulated wholesale prices and a federally regulated seller, say reports.
But Kansas wants to control its own gas price rules. “We’re asking the Supreme Court to reject the federal government’s view that only Washington has the legal power to protect Kansas natural gas purchasers from costly illegal price fixing,” AG Schmidt says. “The federal Natural Gas Act clearly gives states a regulatory role over natural gas and it is transported and distributed within the state. Kansas antitrust laws protect consumers and taxpayers by ensuring a fair, competition retail marketplace for natural gas.”
The dispute stems from lawsuits accusing retailers of illegally fixing gas prices; according to reports, several cases have been consolidated in Nevada. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has allowed the plaintiffs – which include Topeka Unified School District and Learjet, based in Kansas – to move forward with their state-law claims. But defendants are asking the Supreme Court to toss the lawsuit on grounds that federal law preempts state law when it comes to gas market price-fixing.
Reports say the case is set for oral argument in the Supreme Court in January.
Full content: Infozine
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI