Power management conglomerate Eaton avoided a potential multibillion dollar antitrust fine in a last-minute settlement reached with Meritor, which sued Eaton for antitrust violations, according to reports.
A jury trial set to begin Monday was called off after Eaton and Meritor reached an agreement to end the suit, filed by Meritor Transmission and affiliate ZF Meritor on claims Eaton offered unfair rebates and exclusive contracts to gain market dominance.
Eaton was facing up to $2.4 billion in damages claims but has agreed to pay $500 million to settle the case, reports say.
Meritor accused Eaton of offering “exclusive dealing contracts” and unfair incentives to gain a 90 percent truck transmissions market share. A jury in 2009 found Eaton had caused damages to Meritor for the anticompetitive behavior.
Full content: Bloomberg
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Croatian Supermarket Chain Tommy Cleared to Acquire Brodokomerc Nova
Oct 13, 2024 by
CPI
X and Unilever Settle Antitrust Dispute, Continuing Partnership
Oct 13, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Allows Antitrust Claims Against GoDaddy to Proceed
Oct 13, 2024 by
CPI
Court Ruling Opens Door for Microsoft to Sell Xbox Games on Android Without Google’s Cut
Oct 13, 2024 by
CPI
Realtors Appeal to Supreme Court Over DOJ’s Investigation into Antitrust Violations
Oct 13, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh