James J. Tierney, the government antitrust lawyer who oversaw the complaint accusing six major Silicon Valley companies of colluding not to recruit competitors’ employees, is leaving the federal job to join the law firm Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe.
The chief of the Justice Department’s networks and technology enforcement section, Mr. Tierney, 62, worked for the government for 26 years. He oversaw all civil antitrust enforcement and competition policy in the areas of computer hardware and software, high technology component manufacturing, financial services, securities industries and professional associations.
In the no-poaching case, the government accused Adobe Systems, Apple, Google, Intel, Intuit and Pixar Animation of entering into agreements that blocked the recruiting of each other’s employees. The government argued that such a pact undercut competition among companies vying for employees with advanced or highly specialized skills, and squelched competition among workers — effectively putting a lid on wages and depriving them of access to better job opportunities.
The agreements, overseen by senior executives, had barred companies from “cold calling” a competitor’s workers to make better compensation offers, according to a 2010 settlement.
The companies did not admit legal wrongdoing when they signed the settlement, which disallowed practices like the ban on cold calling and which was effective for five years.
Mr. Tierney, who has been the networks and technology section head since 2006, will join Orrick’s office in Washington as a partner with an antitrust practice, starting on Aug. 22. Founded in San Francisco, Orrick specializes in technology, energy and infrastructure law.
Full Content: NY Times
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Goldman Sachs Resolves Decade-Old Metal-Rigging Class Action Lawsuit
May 5, 2024 by
CPI
Italian Antitrust Ruling Puts Halt on Intesa Sanpaolo’s Fintech Ambitions
May 5, 2024 by
CPI
Google Antitrust Case: Closing Arguments Conclude
May 5, 2024 by
CPI
NCAA Faces Potential $2.7 Billion Settlement in Landmark Suit
May 5, 2024 by
CPI
Google Responds to Epic’s Antitrust Demands as ‘Overreaching’ and ‘Unnecessary’
May 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI