AU Optronics, which was fined $500 million by the Department of Justice for its role in an international LCD screen price-fixing scandal, is now challenging the interpretation of a statute that allowed authorities to levy such a large fine. It’s a contest that could possibly change the way price-fixers are fined. According to reports, AU Optronics has submitted the case to the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to dispute the way the statue was interpreted, which allowed maximum fines to be issued based on the gains from an offense. Before the trial against AU Optronics even began, a US district judge ruled that fines issued against those accused of fixing prices could be determined based on the collective gains of all parties involved; AU Optronics, however, says that the fines should have been determined based on gains made only by itself. Reports say the outcome of the appeal may have major effects for future price-fixing cases. If the $500 million fine is upheld, it will strengthen government decisions within similar cases, earning a strong advantage within price-fixing cases that involve large markets. According to one analyst, James McGinnis, an antitrust lawyer at Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, if the fine is upheld it could lead to “literally catastrophic” fines issued in the future.
Featured News
Toast Faces FTC Lawsuit Over Alleged Hidden Fees and Subscription Practices
Oct 29, 2026 by
CPI
Amazon, Uber and Instacart Challenge NYC Delivery Worker Protections in Federal Court
Oct 29, 2026 by
CPI
Wall Street Law Giant Weil Gotshal to Dissolve After Partner Exodus
Oct 29, 2026 by
CPI
DoorDash to Acquire Instacart in $17 Billion Grocery Delivery Deal
Oct 29, 2026 by
CPI
Anthropic Urges California to Give Courts Power to Block High-Risk AI Models
Oct 29, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Exclusive Dealing
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
Exclusive Dealing Without Exclusivity: Screening Contracts, Loyalty Rebates, and the Limits of Antitrust Tests
Oct 25, 2026 by
David Martimort & Jérôme Pouyet
When Competition for Exclusivity Raises Prices: Rebates, Pricing Rules, and the Insulin Puzzle
Oct 25, 2026 by
Daniel P. O’Brien & Greg Shaffer
Why Leaving the Door Open Can Be (Much) Worse Than Closing It: Share-Based Requirements, Buyer-Specific Costs, and Foreclosure
Oct 25, 2026 by
Zhijun Chen & Greg Shaffer
Antitrust Chronicle® – EU Merger Guidelines
Oct 19, 2026 by
CPI