A Minneapolis federal judge has thrown out a lawsuit against Supervalu and C&S Wholesale Grocers, ruling that the two largest grocery wholesalers in the US did not hamper competition in the market with their 2003 agreement over distribution regions. The agreement, which included some non-compete clauses, pertained to a swap of distribution regions in the Midwest and New England. The two were sued in 2009 by two supermarkets, but US Distrit Judge Ann Montgomery has ruled that the supermarkets failed to prove enough evidence of “unreasonable restraint of trade” resulting from the deal.
Full Content: Star Tribune
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
UFC Reaches $375 Million Settlement in Antitrust Case
Feb 6, 2025 by
CPI
Brazilian Architecture Council Convicted of Antitrust Violations
Feb 6, 2025 by
CPI
Bipartisan Bill Seeks to Ban Chinese AI Software from US Government Devices
Feb 6, 2025 by
CPI
Senators Call for Investigation into RealPage Algorithm’s Impact on Military Housing Costs
Feb 6, 2025 by
CPI
ECB Seeks Faster Digital Euro Legislation Amid US Stablecoin Push
Feb 6, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – International Criminal Enforcement
Jan 23, 2025 by
CPI
The Antitrust Division’s Recent Work to Combat International Cartels
Jan 23, 2025 by
Emma Burnham & Benjamin Christenson
Information Sharing: The New Frontier of U.S. Antitrust Enforcement
Jan 23, 2025 by
Brian P. Quinn, Casey Kovarik & Michael Tubach
The Key Role of Guidelines on Exchanges of Information Among Competitors and the Divergent Transatlantic Paths
Jan 23, 2025 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz & Albert Metz
Leniency, Whistleblowers, and Compliance
Jan 23, 2025 by
Richard Powers, Tara O’Malley & Cory Gordon