A Minneapolis federal judge has thrown out a lawsuit against Supervalu and C&S Wholesale Grocers, ruling that the two largest grocery wholesalers in the US did not hamper competition in the market with their 2003 agreement over distribution regions. The agreement, which included some non-compete clauses, pertained to a swap of distribution regions in the Midwest and New England. The two were sued in 2009 by two supermarkets, but US Distrit Judge Ann Montgomery has ruled that the supermarkets failed to prove enough evidence of “unreasonable restraint of trade” resulting from the deal.
Featured News
Florida Sues Prime Therapeutics, Express Scripts Over Alleged Price Fixing
Aug 27, 2026 by
CPI
Iowa, Montana Ask Supreme Court to Halt Paramount Merger Challenge
Aug 27, 2026 by
CPI
Google Reaches £260 Million Deal to Settle UK App Developer Case
Aug 27, 2026 by
CPI
KKR Agrees to Record $250 Million Penalty in US Merger-Filing Case
Aug 27, 2026 by
CPI
Poland Seeks €250 Million EU Fine Against Meta Over Scam Ads
Aug 27, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – State Attorneys General
Aug 27, 2026 by
CPI
CPI Talks… with Jonathan Skrmetti, Attorney General of Tennessee
Aug 27, 2026 by
Jonathan Skrmetti
What the Live Nation Jury Instructions Tell Us About California’s Unfair Competition Law
Aug 27, 2026 by
Henry Hauser, Brent Nakamura, Ashley Kaplan, Brian Wang & Cari Jeffries
From Backroom Deals to Public Scrutiny: The Tunney Act’s Past, Present, and Future
Aug 27, 2026 by
Christina M. Black & Ashley A. Locke
Understanding the Fragility of Economic Concentration Through the Principles of Ecology
Aug 27, 2026 by
Alexandra Spring