US: Motion filed to dismiss suit against Blue Cross, but insurer not off the hook
A joint motion was filed with the US District Court in Detroit on Tuesday to dismiss a suit against Blue Cross Blue Shield concerning the insurer’s “most favored nation” clauses in various contracts. The Department of Justice, the state of Michigan and BCBS have filed the motion in response to recent legislation banning the most favored nation clauses for all health insurers. The law goes into affect January 2014, but the state’s insurance commissioner has ordered insurers to not use the clause in any contract as of February 2013. The most favored nation clauses were considered anticompetitive as it forced some hospitals to charge higher prices when dealing with BCBS’s competitors.
Full Content: Becker’s Hospital Review
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI