US: Motion filed to dismiss suit against Blue Cross, but insurer not off the hook
A joint motion was filed with the US District Court in Detroit on Tuesday to dismiss a suit against Blue Cross Blue Shield concerning the insurer’s “most favored nation” clauses in various contracts. The Department of Justice, the state of Michigan and BCBS have filed the motion in response to recent legislation banning the most favored nation clauses for all health insurers. The law goes into affect January 2014, but the state’s insurance commissioner has ordered insurers to not use the clause in any contract as of February 2013. The most favored nation clauses were considered anticompetitive as it forced some hospitals to charge higher prices when dealing with BCBS’s competitors.
Featured News
Sullivan & Cromwell Names New Antitrust Co-Head
Nov 1, 2026 by
CPI
Danish Furniture Brand Hübsch Fined €670,000 in Price-Fixing Case
Nov 1, 2026 by
CPI
UK Court Backs Ofcom in Legal Battle With Meta, TikTok and X
Nov 1, 2026 by
CPI
House Democrat Targets Trump’s Antitrust Settlements With New Oversight Bill
Nov 1, 2026 by
CPI
Vail Resorts, Alterra Seek Dismissal of Ski Price-Fixing Suit, Deny Collusion Claims
Nov 1, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Exclusive Dealing
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
Exclusive Dealing Without Exclusivity: Screening Contracts, Loyalty Rebates, and the Limits of Antitrust Tests
Oct 25, 2026 by
David Martimort & Jérôme Pouyet
When Competition for Exclusivity Raises Prices: Rebates, Pricing Rules, and the Insulin Puzzle
Oct 25, 2026 by
Daniel P. O’Brien & Greg Shaffer
Why Leaving the Door Open Can Be (Much) Worse Than Closing It: Share-Based Requirements, Buyer-Specific Costs, and Foreclosure
Oct 25, 2026 by
Zhijun Chen & Greg Shaffer
Antitrust Chronicle® – EU Merger Guidelines
Oct 19, 2026 by
CPI