US: Motion filed to dismiss suit against Blue Cross, but insurer not off the hook
A joint motion was filed with the US District Court in Detroit on Tuesday to dismiss a suit against Blue Cross Blue Shield concerning the insurer’s “most favored nation” clauses in various contracts. The Department of Justice, the state of Michigan and BCBS have filed the motion in response to recent legislation banning the most favored nation clauses for all health insurers. The law goes into affect January 2014, but the state’s insurance commissioner has ordered insurers to not use the clause in any contract as of February 2013. The most favored nation clauses were considered anticompetitive as it forced some hospitals to charge higher prices when dealing with BCBS’s competitors.
Featured News
Michigan Loses Antitrust Case Accusing Oil Giants of Blocking Renewable Energy
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Chief Says European SpaceX Challenger Will Face Full Merger Scrutiny
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
Canada Competition Bureau, Empire Settle Grocery Property-Control Probe
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
DoorDash $131.5 Million Settlement Puts New Focus on Gig Economy Regulation
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
UN Chief Presses for Global AI Framework With Independent Oversight
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton