A recently-filed federal lawsuit in the state of New Jersey has reportedly re-opened the debate as to the relationship between antitrust law and professional certification boards. The suit, filed April 23, concerns the practice of requiring healthcare specialists to participate in a training and testing program, or else risk being barred from practicing in the market. The suit accuses the American Board of Medical Specialties, which oversees 24 medical boards, of violating antitrust law by hampering competition through the exclusion of those healthcare specialists. The case was initiated by physicians opposed to the requirement. The case may have strong implications for various other markets, as similar requirements are held within professions like accounting and law. According to one expert, while these cases are not uncommon, they are rarely successful for the professionals who initiate the contest.
Featured News
Medtronic Slapped With $382M Antitrust Verdict in Bundling Case
Feb 6, 2026 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Senators Push Back as Trump Admin Greenlights Direct-to-Consumer Drug Sales
Feb 5, 2026 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Rio Tinto and Glencore Call Off Talks on $260B Mining Tie-Up
Feb 5, 2026 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Senate Bill Aims to Curb Fraud Ads on Social Media Platforms
Feb 5, 2026 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Pentagon Pressed to Review SpaceX Over Alleged Chinese Investment Links
Feb 5, 2026 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Hub-&-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
CPI
A Data Analytics Company as the Hub in a Hub-and-Spoke Cartel
Jan 26, 2026 by
Joseph Harrington
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Jan 26, 2026 by
Patrick Van Cayseele
Hub-and-Spoke Collusion or Vertical Exclusion? Identifying the Rim in Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz, Pedro Gonzaga, Laura Ildefonso & Albert Metz
The Algorithmic Middleman in a Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy: Divergent Court Decisions and the Expanding Patchwork of State and Local Regulations
Jan 26, 2026 by
Bradley C. Weber