New filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission have offered new insight into a longstanding battle with a disgruntled shareholder who sued over plans for banks Roma Financial and Investors Bancorp to merge. Those documents provide further details on how the potential deal first came to the table; according to the papers, the deal to buy Roma, which was struggling at the time, was made for $524 million in an all-stock deal. But shareholder Joseph Zalescik initiated a putative class-action filed in January over the deal, arguing the merger undervalued Roma and limited competition by making it difficult for Roma to find competing offers. To settle the case, the banks agreed to release more detailed information about the deal to shareholders; a vote is set for May 30 to approve of the deal.
Featured News
India Defends Global Turnover Antitrust Rule as Apple Challenges Multibillion-Dollar Fine
Jan 11, 2026 by
CPI
China Probes Food Delivery Platforms Over Competition Practices
Jan 11, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount Urges Congress to Scrutinize Netflix Deal for Warner Bros. Discovery Assets
Jan 11, 2026 by
CPI
X Claims Music Publishers Colluded to Enforce Costly Licensing Terms
Jan 11, 2026 by
CPI
EU Issues Guidance to Clarify Enforcement of Foreign Subsidies Rules
Jan 11, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
Learning from Divergence: The Role of Cross-Country Comparisons in the Evaluation of the DMA
Dec 16, 2025 by
Federico Bruni
New Regulatory Tools for the EU Foreign Direct Investment Screening and Foreign Subsidies Regulation
Dec 16, 2025 by
Ioannis Kokkoris
“Suite Dreams”: Market Definition and Complementarity in the Digital Age
Dec 16, 2025 by
Romain Bizet & Matteo Foschi
The Interaction Between Competition Policy and Consumer Protection: Institutional Design, Behavioral Insights, and Emerging Challenges in Digital Markets
Dec 16, 2025 by
Alessandra Tonazzi