A PYMNTS Company

US: New judge chosen to oversee PG&E antitrust suit amid lobbying concerns

By  |  September 25, 2014

A California state agency has reportedly chosen a new judge to preside over a lawsuit accusing Pacific Gas and Electric Co of rate-rigging amid concerns of a lobbying campaign that may have tainted the original choice.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The California Public Utilities Commission, which regulates PG&E, said Wednesday that it chose a new judge to oversee the $1 billion case, noting that a “cloud of suspicion” was cast over the original judge-choosing process. A PG&E executive is reportedly suspected to have launched a lobbying campaign to influence the Commission’s judge selection.

    Reports say the executive is suspected of using PG&E’s support of a project backed by the Commission’s president to manipulate the process.

    The Commission has reportedly chosen a new judge after emails emerged last week that reportedly showed correspondences between PG&E executives and Commission officials.

    The lawsuit surrounds PG&E’s plans to have its customers pay for $1.3 billion worth of gas-safety improvements following a fatal 2010 pipeline accident.

    Full content: SFGate

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.