A new policy that changes who can be named in corporate plea agreement cases is being welcomed by the defense bar, but some lawyers are unsure of how the change will play out in real-world cases. The change, announced by Assistant Attorney General William Baer earlier this month, means fewer individuals would be named when the DOJ negotiates a plea with a company. Defense lawyers have praised the change, as they have argued that naming the individuals unjustly “tarred” the reputation of those individuals who have been named but not charged. But some lawyers have suggested the policy may complicate plaintiffs’ lawyers looking to take advantage of government investigations, as individuals will not be identified. Additionally, some lawyers speculate that the policy may make it difficult for lawyers of companies not named in the plea agreement but may have been investigated by authorities as part of the same probe.
Full Content: Thomson Reuters
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI