Plaintiffs in a high-profile antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA said they do not plan to appeal a recent ruling in the case, noting that they are “pleased” with the judge’s decision in a dispute over athlete compensation.
”We are pleased with the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law,” a representative for the plaintiffs said.
The suit was filed by Ed O’Bannon and later joined by other former NCAA collegiate athletes. US District Judge Claudia Wilken ruled in August that the NCAA violates antitrust law by capping compensation given to certain players; those violations “unreasonably restrain trade,” the judge found.
The NCAA has appealed the decision.
Following the O’Bannon ruling, the NCAA is facing additional antitrust lawsuits that some experts say could upend the business model of college sports.
Full content: USA Today
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Australia’s Major Supermarkets Face Scrutiny Over Profit Margins Amid Rising Prices
Mar 21, 2025 by
CPI
Fired FTC Commissioners Warn of Potential White House Influence Over Mergers
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Dr. Matthew Backus Joins Compass Lexecon as an Affiliate
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
UK to Boost Broadband Competition While Capping Openreach Charges, Says Ofcom
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Singapore Competition Watchdog Yet to Receive Formal Notification on Grab-GoTo Merger
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li